If king george was not nuts ?


wasn't king george responsible american revolution, british parliament. parliament driving force behind taxation of colonists of 13 colonies, many, many of them despised, slogan 'no taxation without representation' born. reason why king did not have direct power on colonists because of magna carta signed king john in 1215, moved power of imposing taxes , such on british subjects british parliament. however, people thomas jefferson blame king of britain, though had nothing why colonists angry , sparked revolution. therefore, if british parliament not rough on 13 colonies, maybe usa included in commonwealth. if true, however, not called united states of america, since republic, means not part of constitutional monarchy (as canada is, same true of australia believe) or monarchy, no monarch present in system of representation/government representation, president of is. so, canada...who knows like??

conclude, king george have been nuts whole life , wuouldn't have impacted events lead creation of usa.

would usa have uk royals ruling them canada , australia ?


Society & Culture Royalty Next



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Connections Academy...?

SOMEONE WITH COMPUTER KNOWLEDGE PLEASE HELP ME!?

Is there any website which would tell the history if we provide the second name or surname?