How is pointing at fossils as some sort of proof for evolution stupid?
creationist advocates have developed elaborate explanations dismiss significance of fossils evidence evolution.
example, point sites older fossils occur on top of layers containing younger fossils, , disproves entire concept of geological column. ignores geological processes fold layers of rocks over, older fossils on top.
there's s list of common creationist claims short accurate scientific responses in link below.
find out particular objection christian interlocutor has, in talk origins index, , deliver response them. repeat process until admit defeat , concede evolution real.
aside, there millions of god-fearing, bible believing christians around world believe in dark spirits , angels, have no problem accepting theory of evolution normal part of modern science. 1 rather idiosyncratic flavour of christianity has problem evolution.
regarding answer indi - no disrespect, not free pick , choose parts of science believe in. it's not creationism , evolution 2 equally sound , valid ideas, competing our acceptance. evolution part of science. creationism superstitious nonsense. rejecting creationism not rejecting christianity, bible, or belief in god. rejecting creationism rejecting silly nonsense.
hope helps.
some christian believes dark spirits , angels pestering me
Social Science Anthropology Next
Comments
Post a Comment